Analysis of factors related to the high choice of injectable contraceptives by acceptors
Analisis faktor yang berhubungan dengan tingginya pemilihan kontrasepsi suntik oleh aseptor
Keywords:
Injectable contraceptives, Family planning, Contraceptive choice, Reproductive health, Demographic factorsAbstract
Background: Three-monthly injectable contraception is a contraceptive method that works by releasing the hormone progesterone into the bloodstream. The impact of using injectable contraception is that menstrual disorders are often found, and fertility is delayed by four to five months. In 2023, 37.3% of acceptors chose three-monthly contraceptive injections, 18.4% pills, 15.2% implants, 14.2% monthly injections, 8.6% intrauterine device, 6.1% condoms, and tubectomy of 0.4%.
Objective: Analysis of factors related to the high choice of injection contraceptives by acceptors.
Method: Quantitative analytical survey research with a cross-sectional approach was conducted to assess age groups, education levels, parity, level of knowledge, and attitudes in choosing injectable contraception. Data were collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.
Results: The largest number of contraceptive acceptors were 20 people of early childbearing age, 26 people with elementary and middle school education, 27 people with multipara, 22 people with good knowledge, and 30 people with a positive attitude. The choice of contraceptive device is related to age (p=0.021), education level (p=0.021), parity (p=0.017), level of knowledge (p=0.009), and attitude (p=0.024) of the acceptor.
Conclusion: Age, education level, parity, level of knowledge, and attitudes are factors that influence the choice of injectable contraceptive acceptors.
References
Affandi, B. (2013). Practical Guide to Contraceptive Services [in Indonesia]. Jakarta: PT. Bina Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo.
Asmariyah, A. (2021). Factors influencing the choice of the Depo Provera injectable contraceptive device among family planning acceptors in Bengkulu City [in Indonesia]. Journal Of Midwifery, 9(2), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.37676/jm.v9i2.1828
Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional - Badan Pusat Statistik - Kementerian Kesehatan – USAID. (2018). Indonesian demographic and health survey [in Indoensia]. Jakarta: Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional, Badan Pusat Statistik, Kementerian Kesehatan, USAID. https://archive.org/details/LaporanSDKI2017/page/n14/mode/1up
BPS-Statistics of Kalimantan Timur Province, (2022). Kalimantan Timur Province in Figures 2022 [in Indonesia]. Samarinda: BPS-Statistics of Kalimantan Timur Province.
Hartanto, H. (2017). Various Contraceptive Methods [in Indonesia]. Jakarta: EGC.
Hasnani, F. H. (2019). Factors that influence acceptors in choosing injectable contraceptives [in Indonesia]. Quality : Jurnal Kesehatan, 13(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.36082/qjk.v13i1.52
Henderson, C. J., & K. (2020). Textbook of Midwifery Concepts 3rd edition [in Indonesia]. EGC.
Magdalena, M. T., Dheny, R., & Wulandari, R. (2021). Factors that influence family planning acceptors in choosing contraception at the Gondang Community Health Center, Sragen Regency [in Indonesia]. http://eprints.ukh.ac.id/id/eprint/1735/1/ARTIKEL MEYKA THALITA.pdf
Notoatmodjo, S. (2017). Health promotion and behavioral science. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Ministry of Health Indonesia Republic (2023). Indonesia health profile 2022 [in Indonesia]. Jakarta: Ministry of Health Indonesia Republic. https://www.kemkes.go.id/app_asset/file_content_download/1702958336658115008345c5.53299420.pdf
Putri, D., Nurullita, U., & Pujiati, N. (2013). Description of menstrual patterns of 1-month and 3-month injection contraceptive acceptors (Study at BPM T Tlogosari, Semarang City, 2012) [in Indonesia]. Jurnal Kebidanan, 2(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.26714/jk.2.1.2013.%p
Saifuddin, A. B. (2016). Midwifery science [in Indonesia]. Edisi Keempat, Cetakan Kelima. PT Bina Pustaka.
Sardevi & Sembiring, N. M. P. Br. (2023). Factors Associated with the Selection of Injectable Contraceptives for Women of Childbearing Age at the Independent Midwife Practice Efita in 2022 [in Indonesia]. Jurnal Sains Dan Kesehatan, 6(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.57214/jusika.v6i2.232
Septalia, R., & Puspitasari, N. (2017). Factors influencing the choice of contraceptive methods [in Indonesia]. Journal of Biometrics and Population, 5(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.20473/jbk.v5i2.2016.91-98
Suherman, R. M., Widjajanegara, H., & Yuniarti, L. (2017). Relationship between Acceptor Characteristics and Choice of Contraceptive Method (Study in Argapura District, Majalengka Regency [in Indonesia]. Bandung Meet Glob Med Heal, 1(1), 99–105.
Syukaisih. (2015). Factors related to the choice of contraception at the Rambah Samo Community Health Center, Rokan Hulu Regency [in Indonesia]. Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas (Journal of Community Health), 3(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.25311/keskom.Vol3.Iss1.99
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, (2022). World Family Planning 2022: Meeting the changing needs for family planning: Contraceptive use by age and method. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 4 (https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2023/Feb/undesa_pd_2022_world-family-planning.pdf).
WHO. (2015). Medical eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use Fifth Editions. Geneva: WHO.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mandhareta Setyabudhi, Elvine Ivana Kabuhung, Iwan Nuwindry, Novita Dewi Iswandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Health Sciences International Journal (HSIJ) © 2023 by Ananda Health and Education Foundation is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
